Scope the decision
We agree the decision to be made, the evidence required, access, and the people involved before the engagement begins.
Engagement
Most investment technology problems are not tooling problems. They are sequencing problems - the data layer, the research environment, and the execution path were built at different times, by different people, for a smaller firm than the one that exists now. I design the target architecture and the order in which to get there.
How it works
We agree the decision to be made, the evidence required, access, and the people involved before the engagement begins.
I work through the research, data, code, systems, and claims relevant to the agreed scope.
Findings, supporting evidence, priorities, and unresolved questions are delivered in writing and discussed with your team.
Scope
Data flows, systems, manual steps, where the firm actually loses time.
Vendors, storage, point-in-time guarantees, cost per marginal dataset.
Reproducibility, environment parity, how ideas reach production.
Where the logic lives, who can change it, how it's tested.
Order path, reconciliation, failure modes.
What breaks silently today.
Per component, with reasoning, not preference.
Output
Target architecture document with component-level decisions and rationale
Current-state assessment and gap analysis
Sequenced implementation roadmap: what to build first, what it unblocks, and what can wait
Build/buy recommendations with indicative cost and headcount implications
Two working sessions with your team plus one review round
Decision
A roadmap your team can execute against and you can budget against - with the reasoning attached, so decisions survive the next hire and the next vendor conversation.
Recommendations are vendor-neutral. If a QuantJourney component is relevant, I disclose the overlap explicitly and treat it as one option alongside external or internal alternatives.
Engagement
4-6 weeks. From $18,000. Final scope and fee are confirmed after a 30-minute call.